Fulton v. Voth

84 N.Y.S. 1126

This text of 84 N.Y.S. 1126 (Fulton v. Voth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fulton v. Voth, 84 N.Y.S. 1126 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Opinion

MacLEAN, J.

Through the intervention of the plaintiff a contract was made for the sale and purchase of certain property belonging to one of the defendants. Upon the execution of that contract the plaintiff demanded payment of his commission. The professing purchaser did not complete his contract, or even make the first substantial payment, to be made shortly after the first relatively small down payment. While the testimony of the defendants was direct and explicit as to an understanding that the commissions were to be paid upon the completion of the sale, and that the execution of the contract was accompanied by a separate oral agreement, and the plaintiff’s own testimony in contradiction was vacillating and hardly plausible, the learned justice followed the provisions rec[1127]*1127ognizing the broker and agreeing to pay his commissions, put in the contract itself upon the form furnished by one of the title companies. Judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 N.Y.S. 1126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulton-v-voth-nyappterm-1903.