Fulton v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fulton v. State

425 S.W.3d 221, 2014 WL 1225868, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 335

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 25, 2014·No. No. WD 76117·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Prentiss R. Fulton, Jr., appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He contends that the motion court erred in failing to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on all of the claims raised in his amended motion, and he asks that we reverse and remand the judgment to the motion court with [222] instructions to address all of his claims. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provide to the parties, we find no error and affirm the post-conviction judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Prentiss R. Fulton, Jr., appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He contends that the motion court erred in failing to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on all of the claims raised in his amended motion, and he asks that we reverse and remand the judgment to the motion court with [222] instructions to address all of his claims. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provide to the parties, we find no error and affirm the post-conviction judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

Fulton v. State, 425 S.W.3d 221, 2014 WL 1225868, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 335 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

425 S.W.3d 221 (Fulton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.