Fulton v. State

786 So. 2d 671, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8031, 2001 WL 649446
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 13, 2001·No. No. 4D00-2785·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Fulton appeals his habitual felony offender sentence. We affirm because he failed to properly preserve the sentencing error. See Garrett v. State, 788 So.2d 328 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(to be cognizable on appeal, a sentencing error must be brought to the attention of the trial judge at sentencing or by post-trial 3.800(b) motion).

AFFIRMED.

FARMER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fulton v. State, 786 So. 2d 671, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8031, 2001 WL 649446 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

786 So. 2d 671 (Fulton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garrett v. State
788 So. 2d 328 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)