Fulton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fulton v. State

570 So. 2d 1156, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9709, 1990 WL 205508

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fulton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 Fla. L. Weekly 825 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 19, 1990·No. No. 90-0630·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs without notice or the opportunity to be heard. Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision of the judgment without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The judgment and sentence are in all other respects affirmed.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and OFTEDAL, RICHARD, L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs without notice or the opportunity to be heard. Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision of the judgment without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The judgment and sentence are in all other respects affirmed.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and OFTEDAL, RICHARD, L., Associate Judge, concur.

Fulton v. State, 570 So. 2d 1156, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9709, 1990 WL 205508 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

570 So. 2d 1156 (Fulton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related