Fulton v. State
This text of 318 So. 2d 511 (Fulton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Upon a review of the record on appeal and after due consideration of the briefs we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. In particular, allowing the State to cross-examine a witness for the defendant with respect to criminal charges pending against that witness was at the most harmless error under the particular circumstances of this case. See Dennis v. State, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 661; Herzig v. State, Fla.App.1968, 213 So.2d 900; Morrell v. State, Fla.App.1974, 297 So.2d 579; cf. State v. Ramos, 1972, 108 Ariz. 36, 492 P.2d 697.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
318 So. 2d 511, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulton-v-state-fladistctapp-1975.