Fulton v. Peters

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Fulton v. Peters

20 A. 936, 137 Pa. 613, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1003

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 3, 1890

DocketNos. 36, 37

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 20 A. 936 (Fulton v. Peters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fulton v. Peters, 20 A. 936, 137 Pa. 613, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1003 (Pa. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

FULTON V. PETERS.

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff complains, (a) that the learned court erred in reserving as a question of law the third point presented by defendants ; and (&) that the court erred in entering judgment for defendants, non obstante veredicto, on such reserved point. We cannot sustain either objection. There was no exception to the reservation of the point, and for anything that appears [617]*617the judgment non obstante was warranted by the record as presented.

Judgment affirmed.

FULTON V. METZGAR.

This case is identical with Fulton v. Peters, supra, in everything.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI