Fulton v. NYU Langone Hosps.
Opinion
Fulton v NYU Langone Hosps.
2026 NY Slip Op 31059(U)
March 18, 2026
Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 805353/2019 Judge: John J. Kelley
Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service.
This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication.
file:///LRB-ALB-FS1/Vol1/ecourts/Process/covers/NYSUP.8053532019.NEW_YORK.001.LBLX000_TO.html[03/25/2026 3:45:53 PM]
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 264 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2026
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY
PRESENT: HON. JOHN J. KELLEY PART 56M Justice
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X INDEX NO. 805353/2019 JAMES F. FULTON, JR., and KRISTIN L. FULTON, 12/16/2025
Plaintiffs, 12/16/2025 MOTION DATE 12/16/2025 -v-
MOTION SEQ. NO. 003, 004, 005 NYU LANGONE HOSPITALS, NYU LANGONE HOSPITALS –TISCH HOSPITAL, NYU LANGONE HEALTH SYSTEM, NYU LANGONE HEALTH, NYU SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, NYU LANGONE RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, NYU LANGONE DIAGNOSTICS, LLC, MARSHA A. HARRIS, M.D., BRIAN P. HARLIN, M.D., STEVEN Z. BRANDEIS, M.D., COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY OF MANHATTAN, P.C., KAREN B. WAGNER, M.D., LENOX HILL RADIOLOGY AND MEDICAL IMAGING ASSOCIATES, P.C., RADNET, INC., MARISSA L. ANDERSON, M.D., MIROSLAV PEEV, M.D., CHRISTIE A. LECH, M.D., DECISION + ORDER ON ASHLEY C. MILLER, M.D., JOSEPH B. LEVIN, M.D., SEAN MOTION M. FARQUHARSON, M.D., PETER PATALANO, M.D., HERSH CHANDARANA, M.D., JOVAN BEGOVIC, M.D., CLAYTON LI, M.D., SIMENG WANG, M.D., KATIE L. SHERWOOD, P.A., BLAKE A. HOLL, P.A., MENG N. QIAN, P.A., CHRISTOPHER J. BURKE, P.A., JENNIFER KIRSCHENBAUM, R.N., and GUERDELYNE AUGUSTIN, R.N.,
Defendants.
,---------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 003) 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 208, 211, 214, 217, 220, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 252, 253, 256, 257, 261 VACATE/STRIKE - NOTE OF ISSUE/JURY were read on this motion to/for DEMAND/FROM TRIAL CALENDAR .
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 004) 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 209, 212, 215, 218, 221, 223, 224, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 254, 255, 258, 259
VACATE/STRIKE - NOTE OF ISSUE/JURY were read on this motion to/for DEMAND/FROM TRIAL CALENDAR .
The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 005) 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 210, 213, 216, 219, 222, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 260
VACATE/STRIKE - NOTE OF ISSUE/JURY were read on this motion to/for DEMAND/FROM TRIAL CALENDAR .
805353/2019 FULTON, JR., JAMES F vs. NYU LANGONE HOSPITALS Page 1 of 6 Motion No. 003 004 005
1 of 6
[* 1]
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 264 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2026
In this action to recover damages for medical malpractice based on alleged departures from good and accepted practice and for loss of spousal consortium, the defendants NYU Langone Hospitals, NYU Langone Hospitals-Tisch Hospital, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Radiology Associates, NYU Langone Diagnostics, LLC, Marissa L. Anderson, M.D., Miroslav Peev, M.D., Christie A. Lech, M.D., Ashley C. Miller, M.D., Joseph B. Levin, M.D., Sean M. Farquharson, M.D., Peter Patalano, M.D., Hersh Chandarana, M.D., Clayton Li, M.D., Simeng Wang, M.D., Katie L. Sherwood, P.A., Blake A. Holl, P.A., Meng N. Qian, P.A., Christopher J. Burke, P.A., Jennifer Kirschenbaum, R.N., and Guerdelyne Augustin, R.N. (collectively the NYU defendants) move pursuant to 22 NYCRR 202.21(e) to vacate the note of issue and certificate of readiness (MOT SEQ 003). The defendants Marsha A. Harris, M.D., and Colon and Rectal Surgery of Manhattan, P.C. (together the CRSM defendants), move for the same relief, and to extend their time to move for summary judgment if their motion is denied (MOT SEQ 004). The defendants Karen B. Wagner, M.D., and Lenox Hill Radiology & Medical Imaging Associates, P.C. (together the Lenox Hill defendants), also move to vacate the note of issue and extend their time to move for summary judgment if their request to vacate the note of issue is denied (MOT SEQ 005). The plaintiffs oppose the motions. The NYU defendants’ motion is denied. The CRSM defendants’ and Lenox Hill defendants’ motions are granted only to the extent that their deadline for moving for summary judgment is extended until May 19, 2026, and their motions are otherwise denied. On the court’s own motion, the time for the NYU defendants to move for summary judgment is also extended until May 19, 2026.
A court may vacate a note of issue where it appears that a material fact set forth therein, i.e., the representation that discovery is complete, is incorrect (see 22 NYCRR 202.21[e]; Riverside Ctr. Site 5 Owner, LLC v Lexington Ins. Co., 225 AD3d 574, 575 [1st Dept 2024]; Gomes v Valentine Realty LLC, 32 AD3d 699, 700 [1st Dept 2006]; Herbert v Sivaco Wire Corp., 1 AD3d 144, 147 [1st Dept 2003]). Generally, “a note of issue should be vacated when it
is based upon a certificate of readiness that contains erroneous facts” (Cromer v Yellen, 268 805353/2019 FULTON, JR., JAMES F vs. NYU LANGONE HOSPITALS Page 2 of 6 Motion No. 003 004 005
2 of 6
[* 2]
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 264 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2026
AD2d 381, 381 [1st Dept 2000]). In opposition to the several motions, the plaintiffs established that they actually responded to all of the outstanding discovery requests and directives set forth in this court’s case management orders, including the NYU defendants’ March 18, 2022 and October 4, 2022 demands for discovery and inspection, or that such documentation did not exist, except as to the request for time-stamped telephone records concerning conversations between the plaintiff James F. Fulton, Jr., and his wife, the plaintiff Kristin L. Fulton. In connection with those records, the court concludes that the several defendants are not entitled to the contents of those conversations, since they are protected by spousal privilege (see CPLR 4502[b]; Smartmatic USA Corp. v Fox Corp., 227 AD3d 578, 578-579 [1st Dept 2024]; Abe v New York Univ., 139 AD3d 416, 416 [1st Dept 2016]). The court thus discerns no basis for deeming the records themselves to be relevant, since, at most, they would only reveal the dates and times of any such conversations, which would be meaningless in the absence of information concerning the protected contents thereof. Inasmuch as the plaintiffs timely objected, with particularity, to the demands for those records (see generally CPLR 3122[a][1]; DiMaggio v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 228 AD3d 426, 427 [1st Dept 2024]), they fully and properly responded thereto, these items thus do not remain outstanding, and there is no basis to vacate the note of issue because the plaintiffs have not produced these documents.
With respect to the contentions of several of the defendants that they wish to conduct nonparty depositions, the court notes that, in its most recent status conference order dated March 10, 2025, and in all prior compliance and status conference orders, the court ordered that “[a]bsent good cause shown, and discovery issues not raised herein will be deemed waived.” Neither the March 10, 2025 status conference order, nor the numerous status conference orders that preceded it, set forth any provisions concerning the scheduling nonparty witness depositions and, hence, the movants have waived such discovery. The court concludes that the moving defendants have failed to establish the good cause necessary to abrogated that
directive. Similarly, the NYU defendants, as well as the CRSM defendants and the Lenox Hill 805353/2019 FULTON, JR., JAMES F vs. NYU LANGONE HOSPITALS Page 3 of 6 Motion No. 003 004 005
3 of 6
[* 3]
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 264 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/18/2026
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2026 NY Slip Op 31059(U) (Fulton v. NYU Langone Hosps.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.