Fulton v. Northland Associates, Inc.
This text of 248 A.D.2d 1020 (Fulton v. Northland Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Jerry Fulton (plaintiff) was injured while performing masonry work on a construction project at Fort Drum in Watertown. As plaintiff was alighting from a scaffold to the ground, he tripped when he placed his foot on a broken cinder block, which was on the ground. As a result, plaintiff fell and injured his back. Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on liability on the Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action. Plaintiffs injury was not the result of an elevation-related risk covered by Labor Law § 240 (1) but, rather, was the result of the usual and ordinary dangers at a construction site (see, Kvandal v Westminster Presbyt. Socy., 238 AD2d 889; White v Farash Corp., 224 AD2d 978, 979; see also, Misseritti v Mark W Constr. Co., 86 NY2d 487, 491, rearg denied 87 NY2d 969; Gordon v Eastern Ry. Supply, 82 NY2d 555, 561). The court’s reliance on Sherman v Piotrowski Bldrs. (229 AD2d 959) is misplaced. In that case, plaintiff jumped from the roof of a two-story house to a garage roof because there was no ladder, and his injuries were gravity-related. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Murphy, J. — Summary Judgment.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D.2d 1020, 670 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulton-v-northland-associates-inc-nyappdiv-1998.