Fulton v. Krauskopf
This text of 501 N.E.2d 592 (Fulton v. Krauskopf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion by respondents Krauskopf and Burdick, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed that part of an order granting petitioners’ motion for a preliminary injunction, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as dismissed the article 78 proceeding against Perales, dismissed upon the ground that Krauskopf and Burdick are not aggrieved by the dismissal against Perales (CPLR 5511).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
501 N.E.2d 592, 68 N.Y.2d 884, 508 N.Y.S.2d 943, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulton-v-krauskopf-ny-1986.