Fulton v. Black

21 Tex. 424
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 21 Tex. 424 (Fulton v. Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fulton v. Black, 21 Tex. 424 (Tex. 1858).

Opinion

Roberts, J.

This suit is brought against the executrix in possession of property under the will of her husband, made in accordance with Art. 1219, Hart. Dig., which limits the control of the County Court over the estate. Under this article it has been held that such a suit is not maintainable until after application shall have been made to the County Court to require those interested in the estate to give a bond, &c. (Hogue, ex’r, v. Sims et al, 9 Tex. R. 546.)

If the suit was intended as an ordinary action against an executrix, then the petition was defective in not stating a presentation to and rejection by the executrix. (Hart. Dig., Art. 1159.)

In either point of view then, the petition was fatally defective, and the judgment rendered thereon is erroneous. The judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hare v. Reily
269 S.W. 473 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Tex. 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulton-v-black-tex-1858.