Fulton, Supt. v. Schuky

191 N.E. 3, 128 Ohio St. 147, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 147, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 318
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 11, 1934·No. 24361·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, reversed and judgment is entered for the plaintiff in error, for the reason that statutes in derogation of the common law must be strictly construed, and under a strict construction of Section 712, G-eneral Code, presentation of a check for certification is not a presentation for “collection and payment”. Fulton, Supt. of Banks, v. B. R. Baker-Toledo Co., post, 226.

Judgment reversed and judgment for plaintiff in error.

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fulton, Supt. v. Schuky, 191 N.E. 3, 128 Ohio St. 147, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 147, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 318 (Ohio 1934).

191 N.E. 3 (Fulton, Supt. v. Schuky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Toledo Trust Co. v. Fulton, Supt.
198 N.E. 290 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1935)