Fulton, Supt. v. Schuky
This text of 191 N.E. 3 (Fulton, Supt. v. Schuky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, reversed and judgment is entered for the plaintiff in error, for the reason that statutes in derogation of the common law must be strictly construed, and under a strict construction of Section 712, G-eneral Code, presentation of a check for certification is not a presentation for “collection and payment”. Fulton, Supt. of Banks, v. B. R. Baker-Toledo Co., post, 226.
Judgment reversed and judgment for plaintiff in error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 N.E. 3, 128 Ohio St. 147, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 147, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulton-supt-v-schuky-ohio-1934.