Fulton Packing Co. v. Beekman
This text of 274 A.D. 894 (Fulton Packing Co. v. Beekman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover for goods sold and delivered, judgment in favor of respondents and against appellant, entered upon the verdict of a jury, reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. In our opinion the trial court erred in excluding, on respondent Beekman’s objection, portions of an affidavit made by that respondent. The excluded evidence should have been submitted to the jury as an admission by such respondent, inconsistent with respondents’ claims on trial, and its exclusion was prejudicial to appellant’s substantial rights. Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Nolan, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
274 A.D. 894, 82 N.Y.S.2d 638, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulton-packing-co-v-beekman-nyappdiv-1948.