Fulton Land & Improvement Co. v. National Investment & Savings Corp.
59 S.E. 828, 3 Ga. App. 294, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 623
Opinion
The evidence on the trial in the justice’s court was not issuable. Therefore no question of fact was involved; and the superior court, had jurisdictioir to set aside on certiorari the unwarranted judgment, rendered by the magistrate. Toole v. Edmondson, 104 Ga. 776 (31 S. E. 25); Ansley v. Farley, 126 Ga. 425 (55 S. E. 180).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fulton Land & Improvement Co. v. National Investment & Savings Corp., 59 S.E. 828, 3 Ga. App. 294, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 623 (Ga. Ct. App. 1907).
59 S.E. 828 (Fulton Land & Improvement Co. v. National Investment & Savings Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Toole v. Edmondson & Seay Bros.
31 S.E. 25 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Ansley v. Farley
55 S.E. 180 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)