Fulton Housing Authority v. Dailey

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fulton Housing Authority v. Dailey

464 S.W.3d 281, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 713, 2015 WL 3972461

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 2015·No. WD 77486·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Alicia Dailey appeals the judgment entered against her, in favor of the Fulton ' Housing Authority (FHA), on its claims for unlawful detainer and breach of contract, for which the court awarded $1,256.64 in damages. ■ Dailey argues that the court erred in “sustaining the Fulton Housing Authority’s decision to evict” her because the FHA failed to follow the proper procedures under the. lease agreement and H-1JD regulations. Because the court’s judgment was- supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and it neither misstated nor misapplied the law, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Alicia Dailey appeals the judgment entered against her, in favor of the Fulton ' Housing Authority (FHA), on its claims for unlawful detainer and breach of contract, for which the court awarded $1,256.64 in damages. ■ Dailey argues that the court erred in “sustaining the Fulton Housing Authority’s decision to evict” her because the FHA failed to follow the proper procedures under the. lease agreement and H-1JD regulations. Because the court’s judgment was- supported by substantial evidence, was not against the weight of the evidence, and it neither misstated nor misapplied the law, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Fulton Housing Authority v. Dailey, 464 S.W.3d 281, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 713, 2015 WL 3972461 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

464 S.W.3d 281 (Fulton Housing Authority v. Dailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.