Fulton Distributing Co. of Florida v. First National Bank of Eau Gallie

301 So. 2d 116, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8526
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 4, 1974·No. No. 73-922·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record on appeal and after consideration of the briefs and oral arguments for the respective parties, we determine that the trial court’s erroneous instruction to the jury concerning comparative negligence constituted error harmful [117] to the appellant-plaintiff, Fulton Distributing Company of Florida. The trial court was required to instruct the jury on the rule of comparative negligence as delineated- in Hoffman v. Jones, 280 So.2d 431 (Fla.1973). Accordingly, the judgment in favor of the appellee-defendant, First National Bank of Eau Gallie, is reversed and the cause remanded for new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., concur. OWEN, C. J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fulton Distributing Co. of Florida v. First National Bank of Eau Gallie, 301 So. 2d 116, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8526 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

301 So. 2d 116 (Fulton Distributing Co. of Florida v. First National Bank of Eau Gallie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoffman v. Jones
280 So. 2d 431 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
Jones v. Hoffman
272 So. 2d 529 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)