Fulton County Department of Family & Children Services v. R. S. G.

496 S.E.2d 732, 269 Ga. 336, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 901, 1998 Ga. LEXIS 381
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 20, 1998·No. S97A1904, S97X1905·Published

Opinion

Hunstein, Justice.

Having held OCGA § 49-5-180 et seq. to be unconstitutional in State of Ga. v. Jackson, 269 Ga. 308 (496 SE2d 912) (1998), we therefore affirm the superior court’s ruling in Case No. S97A1904. We find no error in the superior court’s refusal to dismiss R. S. G.’s declaratory judgment action and find no merit in Fulton DFCS’s assertion that the superior court’s order was invalid as a mere advisory opinion.

[337]*337Decided March 20, 1998. Thurhert E. Baker, Attorney General, William C. Joy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Shalen A. Sgrosso, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants. Gambrell & Stolz, Seaton D. Purdom, Alvin T. Wong, for appel-lee.

The cross-appeal by R. S. G. is dismissed as moot.

Judgment affirmed in Case No. S97A1904. Appeal dismissed in Case No. S97X1905.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fulton County Department of Family & Children Services v. R. S. G., 496 S.E.2d 732, 269 Ga. 336, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 901, 1998 Ga. LEXIS 381 (Ga. 1998).

496 S.E.2d 732 (Fulton County Department of Family & Children Services v. R. S. G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jackson
496 S.E.2d 912 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1998)