Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills v. Booze

69 S.E. 494, 8 Ga. App. 430, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 208
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 29, 1910
Docket2778
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 69 S.E. 494 (Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills v. Booze) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills v. Booze, 69 S.E. 494, 8 Ga. App. 430, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 208 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

Exceptions to the answer of the magistrate, “filed in writing, specifying the defects, and notice thereof given to the opposite part, before the case is called in its order for a hearing,” are filed in time; and where these requirements of the statute have been complied with, the judge of the superior court erred in refusing to allow the exceptions because they were “not filed at the first term.” Civil Code of 1895, § 4647; Thomas v. State, 7 Ga. App. 637 (67 S. E. 894); Ford v. Toomer, 116 Ga. 795 (43 S. E. 45). Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Norris v. Sibert & Robinson
186 S.E. 199 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Baggs-Langford Motor Co. v. Lewis
129 S.E. 16 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 S.E. 494, 8 Ga. App. 430, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulton-bag-cotton-mills-v-booze-gactapp-1910.