Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills v. Booze

69 S.E. 494, 8 Ga. App. 430, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 208
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 29, 1910·No. 2778·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

Exceptions to the answer of the magistrate, “filed in writing, specifying the defects, and notice thereof given to the opposite part, before the case is called in its order for a hearing,” are filed in time; and where these requirements of the statute have been complied with, the judge of the superior court erred in refusing to allow the exceptions because they were “not filed at the first term.” Civil Code of 1895, § 4647; Thomas v. State, 7 Ga. App. 637 (67 S. E. 894); Ford v. Toomer, 116 Ga. 795 (43 S. E. 45). Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills v. Booze, 69 S.E. 494, 8 Ga. App. 430, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 208 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

69 S.E. 494 (Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills v. Booze) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Norris v. Sibert & Robinson
186 S.E. 199 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Baggs-Langford Motor Co. v. Lewis
129 S.E. 16 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)