Fulp v. Roanoke & Southern Railway Co.
114 N.C. 697
This text of 114 N.C. 697 (Fulp v. Roanoke & Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fulp v. Roanoke & Southern Railway Co., 114 N.C. 697 (N.C. 1894).
Opinion
The demurrer was properly sustained, as the only negligence is that the defendant failed to give any notice of the approach of its train “by whistle, bell or otherwise” to the intestate, who was walking on its track. We know of no law which imposes a liability upon a railroad company upon such meagre allegations.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
114 N.C. 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulp-v-roanoke-southern-railway-co-nc-1894.