Fulp v. Mecklenburg County Jail

160 F. App'x 273
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 31, 2005
DocketNo. 05-7438
StatusPublished

This text of 160 F. App'x 273 (Fulp v. Mecklenburg County Jail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fulp v. Mecklenburg County Jail, 160 F. App'x 273 (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Joel Watkins Fulp appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to comply with its order to file a supplemental complaint to cure the defects in the original complaint. Because Fulp may cure the defect in his complaint by filing a supplemental complaint in accordance with the district court’s order, the dismissal is not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We further deny Fulp’s motion to amend caption. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 F. App'x 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulp-v-mecklenburg-county-jail-ca4-2005.