Fulmore v. MacOn Federal Savings C. Asso.

11 S.E.2d 790, 191 Ga. 151, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 623
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 14, 1940
Docket13340.
StatusPublished

This text of 11 S.E.2d 790 (Fulmore v. MacOn Federal Savings C. Asso.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fulmore v. MacOn Federal Savings C. Asso., 11 S.E.2d 790, 191 Ga. 151, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 623 (Ga. 1940).

Opinion

1. "Possession of land is notice of whatever right or title the occupant has." Code, § 85-408.

2. "Notice sufficient to excite attention and put a party on inquiry shall be notice of everything to which it is afterwards found such inquiry might have led. Ignorance of a fact, due to negligence, shall be equivalent to knowledge, in fixing the rights of parties." Code, § 37-116.

3. The allegations of the petition were sufficient to show that the defendant loan association had notice of the plaintiff's equity in the land at and before the time the association took its security deed from another person, and that such security deed is subject to cancellation as between the plaintiff and the association, whether or not it might still be treated as valid against the grantor to the extent of the latter's interest. Simpson v. Ray, 180 Ga. 395 (178 S.E. 726); Chandler v. Georgia Chemical Works, 182 Ga. 419 (185 S.E. 787, 105 A.L.R. 837); Dyal v. McLean, 188 Ga. 229 (3 S.E.2d 571).

4. From the allegations of the petition it does not appear that the association is entitled to any equitable right, as against the plaintiff, to which he should give effect; and consequently the rule that he who would have equity must do equity is inapplicable. Code, § 37-104; DeVaughn v. Griffith, 149 Ga. 697 (2), 698 (101 S.E. 794); Information Buying Co. v. Miller, 173 Ga. 786 (2) (161 S.E. 617), The case differs on its facts from Harton v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia, 187 Ga. 700 (2 S.E.2d 62), in which the petition affirmatively showed that the plaintiff was indebted to the defendant.

5. The court erred in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the action as to the loan association.

Judgment reversed. All the Justicesconcur.

No. 13340. NOVEMBER 14, 1940.
V. G. Fulmore filed a suit against the Macon Federal Savings and Loan Association, W. O. McNair, and B. R. McNair. Later the plaintiff, by amendment, substituted the name McNair Lumber Supply Co. for W. O. McNair in several places where the latter name alone was used in the original petition. The Macon Federal Savings and Loan Association filed a general and a special demurrer, which the court sustained, dismissing the case as to that *Page 152 party, and the plaintiff excepted. The petition as amended was substantially as follows:

(1) Each of the defendants is a resident of Bibb County.

(2) On July 27, 1938, petitioner contracted to purchase from J. A. King, in his capacity as guardian of May Durden, a described tract of land in Bibb County, Georgia, consisting of a residence lot in the suburb known as South Macon, at and for the sum of $750. It was necessary before said property could be sold that certain legal formalities, not here material, be complied with, but possession of the property having thereon a large frame dwelling was immediately delivered to petitioner. Petitioner remained in possession of said property until after December 5, 1938; such possession being manifested by the erection of three separate houses on said property by petitioner, as fully completed on December 5, 1938, and by the occupation of one of the houses so erected by a tenant; said tenant having moved into such house prior to November 18, 1938, and further by the exercise of every act of dominion over said property to the exclusion of all persons whatsoever.

(3) Petitioner is a builder and contractor, and agreed to buy said property for the purpose of constructing on said property three modern dwellings, using the material in the old house in such construction.

(4) Petitioner had on hand sufficient funds to pay the purchase-price aforesaid and to pay in part for necessary additional materials for the construction of the three houses aforesaid, and approached the McNair Lumber Supply Co. acting through said defendant W. O. McNair, officer and agent of said corporation, about furnishing such other materials as were necessary to the completion of said three houses.

(5) Said McNair Lumber Supply Co., acting through said W. O. McNair, agreed with petitioner that it would furnish or cause to be furnished, such material as was needed by petitioner in the construction of said houses.

(6) Construction on said improvements was begun during the latter part of August, 1938; and during September, October, and the early days of November the improvements were practically completed.

(7) During this time, pursuant to agreement between petitioner *Page 153 and the said W. O. McNair acting for and on behalf of the McNair Lumber Supply Co., the McNair Lumber Supply Co. furnished materials in the total amount of $1049.79, according to invoices furnished by the McNair Lumber Supply Co., beginning August 30, 1938, and ending November 1, 1938.

(8) During this said period petitioner had furnished for the construction aforesaid other necessary materials and had paid various items of labor necessary for such construction, and had himself continuously labored on the construction aforesaid, the reasonable value of such labor by the petitioner being not less than $561.75, and the cash advanced by petitioner from his own funds for the construction aforesaid being not less than $870.65, and in fact much larger. In addition to the materials which petitioner purchased from the said McNair Lumber Supply Co., and in addition to the cash advanced by the said McNair Lumber Supply Co. to or on behalf of petitioner, petitioner procured or caused to be expended in the improvement of the real estate described in paragraph 2 of this petition the following sums: (twenty-two items due to named laborers and materialmen, aggregating $2,147.99.)

(9) In the meantime and on or about the ____day of September, 1938, McNair Lumber Supply Co. had advanced to petitioner the sum of $200 in cash to be used for the payment of labor or materials for the construction aforesaid.

(10) J. A. King, guardian, completed compliance with legal formalities necessary to the sale of said property, and the same was advertised for public sale on the first Tuesday in October, 1938 (October 4), and petitioner prepared to complete said purchase of such property by becoming the purchaser at such sale, and procuring the guardian's deed to the property aforesaid; but W. O. McNair stated to petitioner that it would save recording fees and expenses incidental to the execution and recording of a mortgage if the guardian's deed should be made to W. O. McNair. McNair Lumber Supply Co. furnished the purchase-price of $750, and charged the same to petitioner's account along with materials hereinbefore referred to and the guardian's deed to said property was made to W. O. McNair. After the making of said deed, the McNair Lumber Supply Co. acting through W. O. McNair continued to furnish to petitioner, and charged to him, materials used *Page 154 in completing improvements on said real estate. W. O.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DeVaughn v. Griffith
101 S.E. 794 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)
Information Buying Co. v. Miller
161 S.E. 617 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Simpson v. Ray
178 S.E. 726 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Chandler v. Georgia Chemical Works
185 S.E. 787 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Harton v. Federal Land Bank
2 S.E.2d 62 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Dyal v. McLean
3 S.E.2d 571 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 S.E.2d 790, 191 Ga. 151, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulmore-v-macon-federal-savings-c-asso-ga-1940.