Fulmore v. Fulmore

105 S.E. 285, 115 S.C. 213, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 204
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided December 20, 1920·No. 10546·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fraser.

This is an action for partition. The defendant demurred to the complaint on the ground that the complaint showed that the defendant had been in exclusive possession of the land long enough to presume a deed from its cotenants The demurrer was overruled, and this appeal is from the order overruling the demurrer.

Demurrer is not available to the defendant. Section 119, Code of Procedure, declares:

“But the objection that the action was not commenced within the time limited can only be taken by answer.”

The appeal is dismissed.

Messrs. Justices Hydrick and Watts concur. Mr. Chiee Justice Gary and Mr. Justice Gage absent on account of sickness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fulmore v. Fulmore, 105 S.E. 285, 115 S.C. 213, 1920 S.C. LEXIS 204 (S.C. 1920).

105 S.E. 285 (Fulmore v. Fulmore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Suttles v. Wood
312 S.E.2d 574 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1984)