Fulmore v. England

Fourth Circuit

Fulmore v. England

352 F. App'x 780

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 19, 2009·No. No. 09-1766·Published

Opinion

[781]*781Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Glennie Fulmore appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fulmore v. England, No. 2:09-cv-00075-PMD, 2009 WL 1617079 (D.S.C. June 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[781]*781Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Glennie Fulmore appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fulmore v. England, No. 2:09-cv-00075-PMD, 2009 WL 1617079 (D.S.C. June 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Fulmore v. England, 352 F. App'x 780 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

352 F. App'x 780 (Fulmore v. England) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related