Fulmer v. Buxenbaum
976 N.E.2d 234, 19 N.Y.3d 1012, 2012 NY Slip Op 83571, 951 N.Y.S.2d 707, 2012 WL 3930679, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 2083
This text of 976 N.E.2d 234 (Fulmer v. Buxenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fulmer v. Buxenbaum, 976 N.E.2d 234, 19 N.Y.3d 1012, 2012 NY Slip Op 83571, 951 N.Y.S.2d 707, 2012 WL 3930679, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 2083 (N.Y. 2012).
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying appellant’s motion to strike respondent’s brief in that Court, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
976 N.E.2d 234, 19 N.Y.3d 1012, 2012 NY Slip Op 83571, 951 N.Y.S.2d 707, 2012 WL 3930679, 2012 N.Y. LEXIS 2083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fulmer-v-buxenbaum-ny-2012.