Fullwood v. State

67 Miss. 554
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1890·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Cooper, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

We find no error in the record. It is uniformly held that mere irregularities of officers of elections, not affecting the purity of the election nor the right of the voter, and not in reference to matters made mandatory by law, do not affect the validity of the election.

McCrary on Elections, §§ 192 to 204; Pradat v. Ramsey, 47 Miss. 29.

The certification of the returns of the local option election by a majority of the commissioners was. sufficient. Opinion of the Justices, 68 Maine, 587.

If appellant was the owner of the bar on the steamer Katie Robins, and intoxicating liquor was sold by a person apparently in charge thereof as clerk or agent, the sale was, in the absence of any countervailing testimony, to be taken as a sale by the defendant; and, since there was no such countervailing evidence, the instruction given in behalf of the state was not erroneous.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fullwood v. State, 67 Miss. 554 (Mich. 1890).

67 Miss. 554 (Fullwood v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Briggs v. Gautier
15 So. 2d 209 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1943)
State Ex Rel. Sowell v. Greer
130 So. 482 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1930)
Guice v. McGehee
124 So. 643 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1929)
Ollre v. State
123 S.W. 1116 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1909)
Thurman v. Adams
82 Miss. 204 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1903)