Fullwood v. City of Canton
This text of 275 U.S. 484 (Fullwood v. City of Canton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the unprinted [485]*485record, finds that no Federal question is presented, and the writ of error is therefore also dismissed on the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power and Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195. The costs already incurred herein, by direction of the Court, shall be paid by the Clerk from the special fund in his custody, as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 U.S. 484, 48 S. Ct. 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fullwood-v-city-of-canton-scotus-1927.