Fullrbight v. Boardman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Fullrbight v. Boardman

125 S.E. 524, 33 Ga. App. 80, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 745

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 13, 1924

Docket15368

StatusPublished

This text of 125 S.E. 524 (Fullrbight v. Boardman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fullrbight v. Boardman, 125 S.E. 524, 33 Ga. App. 80, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 745 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, J.

This case is controlled by the following ruling of the Supreme Court, made in response to a question certified. “The act of 1919 (Acts 1919, p. 58), amending the act of 1913 (Acts 1913, p. 91), imposing an inheritance tax upon all property within the jurisdiction of this State, real and personal, which shall pass on the death of the decedent by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, or by deed, grant, or gift, does not extend to the property set apart to the [81]*81widow as a statutory year’s support.” See Fullbright v. Boardman, 159 Ga. 162 (125 S. E. 44).

Decided November 13, 1924. U. J. Fullbright, Isaac S. Peebles Jr., for plaintiff in error. Alexander & Lee, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concv/r.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, J.

This case is controlled by the following ruling of the Supreme Court, made in response to a question certified. “The act of 1919 (Acts 1919, p. 58), amending the act of 1913 (Acts 1913, p. 91), imposing an inheritance tax upon all property within the jurisdiction of this State, real and personal, which shall pass on the death of the decedent by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, or by deed, grant, or gift, does not extend to the property set apart to the [81]*81widow as a statutory year’s support.” See Fullbright v. Boardman, 159 Ga. 162 (125 S. E. 44).

Decided November 13, 1924. U. J. Fullbright, Isaac S. Peebles Jr., for plaintiff in error. Alexander & Lee, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concv/r.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 S.E. 524, 33 Ga. App. 80, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fullrbight-v-boardman-gactapp-1924.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack