Fullmer v. City Lumber Co.

463 P.2d 360, 254 Or. 622, 1969 Ore. LEXIS 415
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided December 31, 1969·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, a lumber broker, brought this action to recover commissions for the sale of lumber he alleged were owed to him by defendant. The case was tried to the court without a jury. The trial court made findings in favor of plaintiff and entered judgment accordingly. Defendant appeals.

The defense was that plaintiff had been working as a partner with another broker named Larson and that the partnership had been overpaid. The trial court found that there had not been a partnership. There is evidence to support the trial court’s findings and those findings, of course, have the validity of a jury verdict. Anaheim Co. v. Holcombe, 1967, 246 Or 541, 548, 426 P2d 743, 746.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fullmer v. City Lumber Co., 463 P.2d 360, 254 Or. 622, 1969 Ore. LEXIS 415 (Or. 1969).

463 P.2d 360 (Fullmer v. City Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lowe v. City of Eugene
463 P.2d 360 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1969)