Fullmer v. City Lumber Co.
This text of 463 P.2d 360 (Fullmer v. City Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff, a lumber broker, brought this action to recover commissions for the sale of lumber he alleged were owed to him by defendant. The case was tried to the court without a jury. The trial court made findings in favor of plaintiff and entered judgment accordingly. Defendant appeals.
The defense was that plaintiff had been working as a partner with another broker named Larson and that the partnership had been overpaid. The trial court found that there had not been a partnership. There is evidence to support the trial court’s findings and those findings, of course, have the validity of a jury verdict. Anaheim Co. v. Holcombe, 1967, 246 Or 541, 548, 426 P2d 743, 746.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
463 P.2d 360, 254 Or. 622, 1969 Ore. LEXIS 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fullmer-v-city-lumber-co-or-1969.