Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Fullington v. State

Fullington v. State

539 So. 2d 1189, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 755, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1462, 1989 WL 25346
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 23, 1989
DocketNo. 88-1083
StatusPublished

This text of 539 So. 2d 1189 (Fullington v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fullington v. State, 539 So. 2d 1189, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 755, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1462, 1989 WL 25346 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a sentence. The first point has been resolved by Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla.1988). The second point requires us to remand for notice and an opportunity to be heard regarding the imposition of costs. Harriet v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla.1988). That portion of the judgment which imposes costs is vacated and this cause remanded for hearing after due notice to all parties.

SENTENCE AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

SHARP, C.J., and GOSHORN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Poore v. State
531 So. 2d 161 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Harriel v. State
520 So. 2d 271 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 So. 2d 1189, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 755, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 1462, 1989 WL 25346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fullington-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.