Fullingim v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Fullingim v. State

1931 OK CR 496, 5 P.2d 1119, 52 Okla. Crim. 319, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 506

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 14, 1931

DocketNo. A-8230.

StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 496 (Fullingim v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fullingim v. State, 1931 OK CR 496, 5 P.2d 1119, 52 Okla. Crim. 319, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 506 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Kiowa county of having the unlawful possession of whisky, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

The only contention made is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment. Without reciting the facts proven, we are satisfied there is sufficient evidence from which the jury might reasonably and logically find defendant guilty.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Kiowa county of having the unlawful possession of whisky, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

The only contention made is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment. Without reciting the facts proven, we are satisfied there is sufficient evidence from which the jury might reasonably and logically find defendant guilty.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1931 OK CR 496, 5 P.2d 1119, 52 Okla. Crim. 319, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fullingim-v-state-oklacrimapp-1931.