Fullingim v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Fullingim v. State

1931 OK CR 496, 5 P.2d 1119, 52 Okla. Crim. 319, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 506

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided November 14, 1931·No. No. A-8230.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Kiowa county of having the unlawful possession of whisky, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

The only contention made is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment. Without reciting the facts proven, we are satisfied there is sufficient evidence from which the jury might reasonably and logically find defendant guilty.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Kiowa county of having the unlawful possession of whisky, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

The only contention made is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment. Without reciting the facts proven, we are satisfied there is sufficient evidence from which the jury might reasonably and logically find defendant guilty.

The case is affirmed.

Fullingim v. State, 1931 OK CR 496, 5 P.2d 1119, 52 Okla. Crim. 319, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 506 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

1931 OK CR 496 (Fullingim v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.