Fullilove v. Banks
62 Miss. 11
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The action of the mother in placing her infant child in the keeping of its alleged grandmother, and promising not to disturb her possession of it, was at least a factor in the judicial determination of the question whether the court should exercise its power in the proceeding by habeas corpus to award the custody of the child to the mother who had thus acted, and we are not satisfied that the Chancellor erred in his conclusion upon all the facts of the case. Wherefore his decree is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fullilove v. Banks, 62 Miss. 11 (Mich. 1884).
62 Miss. 11 (Fullilove v. Banks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bryant v. Cameron
473 So. 2d 174 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1985)
Thompson v. Foster
244 So. 2d 395 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1971)
Governale v. HALEY
87 So. 2d 686 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1956)
Mayfield v. BRAUND, ET UX.
64 So. 2d 713 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1953)
Walker v. WILLIAMS, ET UX.
58 So. 2d 79 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1952)
McAdams v. McFerron Et Ux.
178 So. 333 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1938)
Hibbette v. Baines
78 Miss. 695 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1900)