Fullerton v. O'Brien

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fullerton v. O'Brien

255 A.D. 944, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5931

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 30, 1938·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: A fair question of fact as to the negligence of the defendants was presented and we are of the opinion that the verdict was justified. We have considered the amount of the verdict and find no error therein. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: A fair question of fact as to the negligence of the defendants was presented and we are of the opinion that the verdict was justified. We have considered the amount of the verdict and find no error therein. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.

Fullerton v. O'Brien, 255 A.D. 944, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5931 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

255 A.D. 944 (Fullerton v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.