Fullerton v. O'Brien

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fullerton v. O'Brien

255 A.D. 944, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5931

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 30, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 944 (Fullerton v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fullerton v. O'Brien, 255 A.D. 944, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5931 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: A fair question of fact as to the negligence of the defendants was presented and we are of the opinion that the verdict was justified. We have considered the amount of the verdict and find no error therein. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: A fair question of fact as to the negligence of the defendants was presented and we are of the opinion that the verdict was justified. We have considered the amount of the verdict and find no error therein. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Dowling, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 944, 8 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fullerton-v-obrien-nyappdiv-1938.