Fullerton v. City of Schenectady

130 N.E.2d 909, 309 N.Y. 855, 1955 N.Y. LEXIS 1600
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 17, 1955·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Motion for reargnment denied.

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of the remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended to read as follows: Judgment affirmed, without costs. Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Whether plaintiffs have been deprived of property without due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States; and whether Local Law No. 6 of the City of Schenectady, effective April 16, 1935, is repugnant to the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that there was no denial of any constitutional right of the plaintiffs. [See 309 N. Y. 701.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fullerton v. City of Schenectady, 130 N.E.2d 909, 309 N.Y. 855, 1955 N.Y. LEXIS 1600 (N.Y. 1955).

130 N.E.2d 909 (Fullerton v. City of Schenectady) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Opn. No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 1976
Stanton v. Village of Waverly
275 N.E.2d 337 (New York Court of Appeals, 1971)