Fuller's Estate

95 A. 382, 250 Pa. 78
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 26, 1915·No. Appeal, No. 250·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The relation between the mother of the appellants and William C. Fuller was illicit at its commencement, and the presumption is that it so continued: Hunt’s App., 86 Pa. 294; Appeal of Reading Fire Insurance and Trust Company, 113 Pa. 204; Patterson’s Est., 237 Pa. 24. The burden was upon the appellants to show the actual marriage of their mother to the decedent whose estate they are claiming as his heirs. The court below properly found, under all the testimony, that they had failed to prove a marriage, and their appeal must, therefore, be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fuller's Estate, 95 A. 382, 250 Pa. 78 (Pa. 1915).

95 A. 382 (Fuller's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blue Ridge Textile Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
27 Pa. D. & C.2d 55 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1961)
Kerwin Estate
89 A.2d 332 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1952)
In re Parsons
59 A.2d 709 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1948)
Spencer v. Feitelson & Sons
45 A.2d 260 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1945)
Zuback v. Bakmaz
29 A.2d 473 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1942)
Mays' Estate
15 A.2d 569 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1940)
Fitzpatrick v. Miller
196 A. 83 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Estate of Mary F. Hughes
98 Pa. Super. 328 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Commonwealth ex rel. District Attorney v. Pasquale
11 Pa. D. & C. 669 (Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, 1928)
Dinger v. Friedman
123 A. 641 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)