Fuller Watchman's Electrical Detector Co. v. Louis

Appellate Court of Illinois

Fuller Watchman's Electrical Detector Co. v. Louis

50 Ill. App. 428, 1893 Ill. App. LEXIS 448

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJune 30, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 Ill. App. 428 (Fuller Watchman's Electrical Detector Co. v. Louis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fuller Watchman's Electrical Detector Co. v. Louis, 50 Ill. App. 428, 1893 Ill. App. LEXIS 448 (Ill. Ct. App. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion of the Court,

Gary, P. J.

January 5, 1892, in a case where the appellee was plaintiff and the appellant was defendant, a justice of the peace entered upon his docket, “ whereupon it is considered by this court have and recover of said defendant the. sum of,” etc.

That is no judgment; not being for, or in favor of, anybody ; but the appellant appealed to the Circuit Court.

That appeal gave to the Circuit Court jurisdiction to try the case de novo; Coulterville v. Gillen, 12 111. 599; and it might dismiss either the appeal or the suit for good cause; but in dismissing the appeal the court could not award, under Sec. 71, Ch. 79, R. S., damages upon the amount of the judgment before the justice, when there was no judgment in legal effect. Nevertheless the court did dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and award twenty dollars damages. The appellant moved to set aside the order and judgment; upon what ground, the record here leaves to conjecture. A good ground for setting aside the award of damages is, that there was no judgment by the justice on which to found any damages, and a good ground for going further and setting aside the order dismissing the appeal is, that the defendant asked for it, and the appellee needs it, that he may, if he has a good cause of action, obtain what shall be really a judgment upon it, in the Circuit Court. That all this may be done, the judgment of the Circuit Court, denying the appellant’s motion to set aside the order and judgment, is reversed and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion of the Court,

Gary, P. J.

January 5, 1892, in a case where the appellee was plaintiff and the appellant was defendant, a justice of the peace entered upon his docket, “ whereupon it is considered by this court have and recover of said defendant the. sum of,” etc.

That is no judgment; not being for, or in favor of, anybody ; but the appellant appealed to the Circuit Court.

That appeal gave to the Circuit Court jurisdiction to try the case de novo; Coulterville v. Gillen, 12 111. 599; and it might dismiss either the appeal or the suit for good cause; but in dismissing the appeal the court could not award, under Sec. 71, Ch. 79, R. S., damages upon the amount of the judgment before the justice, when there was no judgment in legal effect. Nevertheless the court did dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and award twenty dollars damages. The appellant moved to set aside the order and judgment; upon what ground, the record here leaves to conjecture. A good ground for setting aside the award of damages is, that there was no judgment by the justice on which to found any damages, and a good ground for going further and setting aside the order dismissing the appeal is, that the defendant asked for it, and the appellee needs it, that he may, if he has a good cause of action, obtain what shall be really a judgment upon it, in the Circuit Court. That all this may be done, the judgment of the Circuit Court, denying the appellant’s motion to set aside the order and judgment, is reversed and the cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 Ill. App. 428, 1893 Ill. App. LEXIS 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-watchmans-electrical-detector-co-v-louis-illappct-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack