Fuller v. Webster Fire Insurance

12 How. Pr. 293
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 How. Pr. 293 (Fuller v. Webster Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fuller v. Webster Fire Insurance, 12 How. Pr. 293 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1856).

Opinion

Davies, Justice.

This is an application for a reference. The defendants object, that the corporation has been dissolved, and that consequently this action cannot be maintained, and is, in fact, not pending.

This suit is brought by the plaintiff as assignee of Blaisdell, former secretary of the company, to recover a large sum due for services rendered and moneys expended by Blaisdell to and for the company.

The suit was commenced on the 14th of November, 1855.

The answer sets up that the company was dissolved on the 27th of September, 1855, and a receiver appointed. It appears, from the proceedings furnished me on this application [294]*294for the appointment of a receiver, that it was made under §§ 47, 48 and 49 of chapter 8, article 2d, title 4, part 3d, of the Revised Statutes.

In the case of Ver Plank agt. The Mercantile Insurance Company of New-York, (2 Paige, 452,) Chancellor Walworth held a similar proceeding to be, “ in effect, a final order in the cause; and, unless altered or revoked, operates as a virtual dissolution of the corporation.”

The suit, therefore, cannot succeed against'the present defendants. It is apparent to me, that this suit has been instituted in good faith, and that it is, in fact, defended by the receiver, who represents the defunct corporation.

The provision of § 173 of the Code, and the powers conferred by it on the court, may, with great propriety, be invoked in this case. I deem it, therefore, in furtherance of justice to make an order in this case, substituting the receiver of the defendants as the party defendant in this cause, and the answer therein do stand as his answer; and that the pleadings be amended accordingly.

And further, that the cause be referred to William Emmerson, Esq., as referee, to report thereon with all convenient speed.

No costs to either party to be allowed on this motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tighe v. Pope
23 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 180 (New York Supreme Court, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 How. Pr. 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-webster-fire-insurance-nysupct-1856.