Fuller v. Texas Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Fuller v. Texas Co.

138 So. 712, 18 La. App. 425, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 44

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 14, 1932

DocketNo. 3975

StatusPublished

This text of 138 So. 712 (Fuller v. Texas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fuller v. Texas Co., 138 So. 712, 18 La. App. 425, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 44 (La. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

DREW, J.

This is a suit to have an instrument declared to be a contract of lease and to be declared to be null and void; and in the alternative, if the court should hold that the instrument is not a mineral lease, but a reservation of mineral rights, then for same to be declared barred by ten years’ nonuser, and that plaintiff be recognized as the owner of all the mineral rights in and to the described land, consisting of 480 acres.

On trial of the case, it was admitted by plaintiff and defendant that the value of the property involved was in excess of $2,000.

The value placed on the property involved by both plaintiff and defendant takes the case out of the jurisdiction of this court. Exercising the authority granted to us by Act No. 19 of 1912, we therefore order this case transferred to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, and .fix the time for appellant to perfect the transfer at 30 days from the time this judgment becomes final.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DREW, J.

This is a suit to have an instrument declared to be a contract of lease and to be declared to be null and void; and in the alternative, if the court should hold that the instrument is not a mineral lease, but a reservation of mineral rights, then for same to be declared barred by ten years’ nonuser, and that plaintiff be recognized as the owner of all the mineral rights in and to the described land, consisting of 480 acres.

On trial of the case, it was admitted by plaintiff and defendant that the value of the property involved was in excess of $2,000.

The value placed on the property involved by both plaintiff and defendant takes the case out of the jurisdiction of this court. Exercising the authority granted to us by Act No. 19 of 1912, we therefore order this case transferred to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, and .fix the time for appellant to perfect the transfer at 30 days from the time this judgment becomes final.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 So. 712, 18 La. App. 425, 1932 La. App. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-texas-co-lactapp-1932.