Fuller v. Sweet

New York Supreme Court

Fuller v. Sweet

9 How. Pr. 74

DecidedMay 15, 1853

StatusPublished

This text of 9 How. Pr. 74 (Fuller v. Sweet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fuller v. Sweet, 9 How. Pr. 74 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1853).

Pincite

Opinion

Welles, Justice.

The action was noticed for trial and placed upon the calendar by the plaintiff’s attorney. On Friday of the first week of the circuit, the trial was, by agreement of the counsel, set down by the court for Tuesday of the second week, and so marked upon the calendar by the court. On Saturday of the first week, the jury were discharged, and on Monday following the circuit adjourned without day. This was a waiver on the part of the defendants of any default of the plaintiff in not moving on the trial previous to its being set down on Friday for the following Tuesday; and after it was so set down, there was no opportunity afforded the plaintiff for. bringing on the trial. In this view, it is quite immaterial whether the plaintiff was in default for not trying the cause previous to setting it down for Tuesday of the second week.

The motion is therefore denied, with $7 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Welles, Justice.

The action was noticed for trial and placed upon the calendar by the plaintiff’s attorney. On Friday of the first week of the circuit, the trial was, by agreement of the counsel, set down by the court for Tuesday of the second week, and so marked upon the calendar by the court. On Saturday of the first week, the jury were discharged, and on Monday following the circuit adjourned without day. This was a waiver on the part of the defendants of any default of the plaintiff in not moving on the trial previous to its being set down on Friday for the following Tuesday; and after it was so set down, there was no opportunity afforded the plaintiff for. bringing on the trial. In this view, it is quite immaterial whether the plaintiff was in default for not trying the cause previous to setting it down for Tuesday of the second week.

The motion is therefore denied, with $7 costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 How. Pr. 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-sweet-nysupct-1853.