Fuller v. Stump & Son

25 S.E. 649, 99 Ga. 316
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 18, 1896·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Atlcinson, J.

There being no exception to nor assignment of error upon the final judgment overruling a motion for a new trial, and the only exceptions taken or errors assigned relating to rulings made at the trial, and the bill of exceptions not having been certified within the timé prescribed by law after the adjournment of the court at which the rulings excepted to were made, [317]*317no questions are presented ■which this court has jurisdiction to consider, and the writ of error is accordingly Dismissed.

August 18, 1896. G. H. StiMon an'd W. T. Gratte, for plaintiff in error. J ones & 'Bowám and J. G. Edwards, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fuller v. Stump & Son, 25 S.E. 649, 99 Ga. 316 (Ga. 1896).

25 S.E. 649 (Fuller v. Stump & Son) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mertins v. Pritchard
70 S.E. 328 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)