Fuller v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Fuller v. State

292 S.W. 908, 106 Tex. Crim. 418, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 182

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fuller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 98 Tex. Crim. 132 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 30, 1927·No. No. 9956.·Published

Opinion

BAKER, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of swindling, and his punishment assessed at seven years in the penitentiary.

This is a companion case to that of D. Conner, alias Dr. J. W. Wilson, v. State, No. 9955, this day decided by .this court. The appellants were separately indicted for the same offense, but were tried together. What we have said in the Conner case, supra, is fully applicable to the instant case. For the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BAKER, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of swindling, and his punishment assessed at seven years in the penitentiary.

This is a companion case to that of D. Conner, alias Dr. J. W. Wilson, v. State, No. 9955, this day decided by .this court. The appellants were separately indicted for the same offense, but were tried together. What we have said in the Conner case, supra, is fully applicable to the instant case. For the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Fuller v. State, 292 S.W. 908, 106 Tex. Crim. 418, 1927 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 182 (Tex. 1927).

Pincite

292 S.W. 908 (Fuller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.