Fuller v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Fuller v. State

1922 OK CR 50, 204 P. 535, 21 Okla. Crim. 71, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 203

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 11, 1922

DocketNo. A-3871.

StatusPublished

This text of 1922 OK CR 50 (Fuller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fuller v. State, 1922 OK CR 50, 204 P. 535, 21 Okla. Crim. 71, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 203 (Okla. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, C. D. Fuller, was informed against for the murder of one James Morris, alleged to have been committed in Tulsa county on the 26th day of December, A. D. 1919, by shooting with a pistol. On Ms trial the jury found him guilty of manslaughter in the first degree *72 and fixed bis punishment at four years in the penitentiary. From the judgment rendered on the verdict on April 27, 1920, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on October 21, 1920, a petition in error with case-made.

His counsel of record has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, stating that the governor of the state has granted a parole to said plaintiff in error.

The motion to dismiss is sustained, the appeal herein is dismissed and the case remanded to the trial court'.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, C. D. Fuller, was informed against for the murder of one James Morris, alleged to have been committed in Tulsa county on the 26th day of December, A. D. 1919, by shooting with a pistol. On Ms trial the jury found him guilty of manslaughter in the first degree *72 and fixed bis punishment at four years in the penitentiary. From the judgment rendered on the verdict on April 27, 1920, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on October 21, 1920, a petition in error with case-made.

His counsel of record has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, stating that the governor of the state has granted a parole to said plaintiff in error.

The motion to dismiss is sustained, the appeal herein is dismissed and the case remanded to the trial court'.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1922 OK CR 50, 204 P. 535, 21 Okla. Crim. 71, 1922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-state-oklacrimapp-1922.