Fuller v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Fuller v. State

93 So. 278, 18 Ala. App. 565, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 228

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 6, 1922

Docket3 Div. 425.

StatusPublished

This text of 93 So. 278 (Fuller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fuller v. State, 93 So. 278, 18 Ala. App. 565, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 228 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The judgment of conviction was rendered in this case on October 19, 1921. The judgment on the motion to set aside the verdict was rendered November 2, 1921. The bill of exceptions is marked presented February 2, 1922. This is more than 90 days after rendition of judgment, and therefore the bill of exceptions, both as to the original case and on the motion for new trial, must be stricken. Wrenn v. Baker, 15 Ala. App. 434, 73 South. 756.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

The judgment of conviction was rendered in this case on October 19, 1921. The judgment on the motion to set aside the verdict was rendered November 2, 1921. The bill of exceptions is marked presented February 2, 1922. This is more than 90 days after rendition of judgment, and therefore the bill of exceptions, both as to the original case and on the motion for new trial, must be stricken. Wrenn v. Baker, 15 Ala. App. 434, 73 South. 756.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 So. 278, 18 Ala. App. 565, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-state-alactapp-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack