Fuller v. Starr
This text of 209 A.D. 852 (Fuller v. Starr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As the plaintiff can establish his cause of action without his burden of proof involving proof of a long account, the cause of action upon the complaint and answer is not referable. (Snell v. Niagara Paper Mills, 193 N. Y. 433; Steck v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co., 142 id. 236.) The order should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, and the case restored to the day calendar for immediate trial. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Merrell, Finch and McAvoy, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, and the ease restored to the day calendar for immediate trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
209 A.D. 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-starr-nyappdiv-1924.