Fuller v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided February 23, 2024·No. 15-1470·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: January 29, 2024

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ANDREA FULLER, on behalf of her * UNPUBLISHED Minor Child, B.F., * * Petitioner, * No. 15-1470V * v. * Special Master Dorsey * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Damages Award; Diphtheria-Tetanus- AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Acellular Pertussis (“DTaP”) Vaccine; * Measles Mumps Rubella (“MMR”) Vaccine; Respondent. * Febrile Seizures; Epilepsy. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Curtis R. Webb, Monmouth, OR, for Petitioner. Mary Eileen Holmes, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES BASED ON PROFFER1

On December 4, 2015, Andrea Fuller (“Petitioner”), on behalf of her minor child, B.F., filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“Vaccine Act” or “the Program”), 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq. (2018).2 Petitioner alleged that as a result of receiving a diphtheria-tetanus-acellular-pertussis (“DTaP”) vaccine on March 12, 2014, B.F. suffered from complex febrile seizures and developed epilepsy, and a measles mumps rubella (“MMR”) vaccine B.F. received on September 18, 2014 significantly aggravated B.F.’s

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the Internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (2018). All citations in this Decision to individual sections of the Vaccine Act are to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa.

1 condition. Amended Petition (“Am. Petition”) at 2 (ECF No. 132). On December 17, 2019, the undersigned issued a ruling finding Petitioner entitled to compensation. Ruling on Entitlement dated Dec. 17, 2019 (ECF No. 140).

On January 29, 2024, Respondent filed a Proffer on Award of Compensation (“Proffer”), attached hereto as Appendix A. In the Proffer, Respondent represented that Petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Proffer at 1-3. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that Petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards Petitioner:

(1) A lump sum payment of $678,053.89, representing compensation for life care expenses in the first year after judgment ($58,710.52), partial lost future earnings ($404,343.37), and pain and suffering ($215,000.00), in the form of a check payable to Petitioner, as guardian(s)/ conservator(s) of the estate of B.F., for the benefit of B.F. (2) A lump sum payment of $10,272.66, representing compensation for past unreimbursable expenses, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner, Andrea Fuller. (3) An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract, subject to the conditions described in Section II.C., that will provide payments for the life care items contained in the life care plan, as illustrated by the chart at Tab A attached to the Proffer, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased.

Proffer at 3-4.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of the Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT herewith.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment is expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS __________________________________________ ) ANDREA FULLER, on behalf of her ) Minor Child, B.F., ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 15-1470V ) Special Master Dorsey SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF ) ECF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) __________________________________________)

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On December 4, 2015, Andrea Fuller (“petitioner”), on behalf of her minor child, B.F.,

filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42

U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 (“Vaccine Act” or “Act”), alleging that as a result of receiving a

diphtheria-tetanus-acellular-pertussis (“DTaP”) vaccine on March 12, 2014, B.F. suffered from

complex febrile seizures and developed epilepsy, and further alleging that a measles mumps

rubella (“MMR”) vaccine B.F. received on September 18, 2014 significantly aggravated B.F.’s

condition. Amended Petition at 2 (ECF No. 132). On December 17, 2019, Special Master

Dorsey issued a Ruling on Entitlement in favor of petitioner. ECF No. 142. Respondent now

proffers the following regarding the amount of compensation to be awarded.1

1 The parties have no objection to the amount of the proffered award of damages. However, respondent reserves his right, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(f), to seek review of the Special Master’s December 17, 2019, Ruling on Entitlement, finding petitioner entitled to an award under the Vaccine Act. This right accrues following the issuance of the damages decision. -1- I. Items of Compensation

A. Life Care Items

Respondent engaged life care planner M. Virginia Walton, M.S.N., RN, FNP, CNLCP,

and petitioner engaged Liz Kattman, M.S. and Helen Woodard, M.A., of ReEntry Rehabilitation

Services, Inc., to provide an estimation of B.F.’s future vaccine-injury related needs. For the

purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine related” is as described in the Special Master’s

December 17, 2019 Ruling on Entitlement. All items of compensation identified in the life care

plan are supported by the evidence and are illustrated by the chart entitled Appendix A: Items of

Compensation for B.F., attached hereto as Tab A.2 Petitioner agrees.

B. Partial Lost Future Earnings

The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, B.F. is not likely to be fully

employed in the future. Therefore, respondent proffers that B.F. should be awarded partial lost

future earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(B). Respondent

proffers that the appropriate award for B.F.'s partial lost future earnings is $404,343.37.

Petitioner agrees.

C. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that B.F. should be awarded $215,000.00 in actual pain and

suffering. See 42 U.S.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fuller v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

Fuller v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Fuller v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-12
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(f)
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(B)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a