Fuller v. Rhododendron Corp.

178 S.E. 116, 207 N.C. 660, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 241
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 28, 1935·Published

Opinion

*661 Stacy, C. J.

On tbe bearing tbe title offered was properly made to depend upon tbe construction of tbe following item in tbe will of Solomon Jones:

“I give, devise, and bequeath my estate and property, real and personal, as follows, tbat is to say:

“My real and personal estate on ‘Mt. Hebron,’ in Henderson County, North Carolina, to go to my wife, Assena T. Jones, during her mortal life, then to be sold and divided equally among my first wife’s children, and if none alive, to my first wife’s grandchildren.”

Tbe case states tbat Jane Cox was tbe only child of tbe testator’s first wife to survive bis widow, Assena T. Jones. Tbe plaintiff has acquired, by mesne conveyances, all of Jane Cox’s interest in said land.

On authority of Brown v. Guthery, 190 N. C., 822, tbe trial court held tbat, under tbe will of Solomon Jones, bis widow, Assena T. Jones, took a life estate in said land, with remainder in fee to tbe children of tbe testator’s first wife who should survive bis widow, and tbat as Jane Cox alone of bis first wife’s children survived bis widow, she was entitled to tbe remainder in fee. This ruling would seem to be correct. Watson v. Smith, 110 N. C., 6, 14 S. E., 640.

Nor is plaintiff’s title affected by tbe testator’s direction to sell tbe land and divide tbe proceeds. Witty v. Witty, 184 N. C., 375, 114 S. E., 482; 40 Cyc., 1999.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fuller v. Rhododendron Corp., 178 S.E. 116, 207 N.C. 660, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 241 (N.C. 1935).

178 S.E. 116 (Fuller v. Rhododendron Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. . Guthery
130 S.E. 836 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1925)
Witty v. . Witty
114 S.E. 482 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
Watson v. . Smith
14 S.E. 640 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1892)
Witty v. Witty
184 N.C. 375 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)