Fuller v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fuller v. New York City Housing Authority

281 A.D.2d 231, 721 N.Y.S.2d 768, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2439

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 281 A.D.2d 231 (Fuller v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fuller v. New York City Housing Authority, 281 A.D.2d 231, 721 N.Y.S.2d 768, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2439 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of respondent Housing Authority, dated October 23, 1997, dismissing petitioner from her position as a Supervisor of Housing Caretakers, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.], entered on or about December 15, 1999), dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports respondent’s findings that petitioner possessed and used illicit drugs, and knowingly permitted her son to use the apartment leased to her by the Housing Authority for the sale of drugs. No basis exists to disturb respondent’s findings of credibility (see, Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444). The penalty of dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness. Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Andrias, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of respondent Housing Authority, dated October 23, 1997, dismissing petitioner from her position as a Supervisor of Housing Caretakers, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.], entered on or about December 15, 1999), dismissed, without costs.

Substantial evidence supports respondent’s findings that petitioner possessed and used illicit drugs, and knowingly permitted her son to use the apartment leased to her by the Housing Authority for the sale of drugs. No basis exists to disturb respondent’s findings of credibility (see, Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444). The penalty of dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness. Concur — Williams, J. P., Tom, Andrias, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D.2d 231, 721 N.Y.S.2d 768, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack