Fuller v. Langford

31 Ill. 248
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1863
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 31 Ill. 248 (Fuller v. Langford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fuller v. Langford, 31 Ill. 248 (Ill. 1863).

Opinion

“Mr. Chief Justice CatoN

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Here a writ of foreign attachment was issued out of the Circuit Court of Stephenson county, directed to the sheriff of Livingston county, who levied it upon property of the defendants. No property was found in Stephenson county, and, in fact, no writ was issued to that county, at least till after a motion was made to quash the writ. We decided in Hinman v. Rushmore, 27 Ill. 509, that, without a service in the county whence the writ issued, the court acquired no jurisdiction. The motions to quash should have been sustained.

The judgments must be reversed.

Judgments reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chapman v. Reddick
41 Fla. 120 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1899)
Knebelkamp v. Fogg
55 Ill. App. 563 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1894)
Lord v. Babel
16 Ill. App. 434 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1885)
House v. Hamilton
43 Ill. 185 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1867)
Haywood v. McCrory
33 Ill. 459 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1864)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Ill. 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-langford-ill-1863.