Fuller v. Knapp

Supreme Court of Vermont

Fuller v. Knapp

72 A. 688, 82 Vt. 166, 1909 Vt. LEXIS 266

CourtSupreme Court of Vermont

DecidedApril 13, 1909

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 72 A. 688 (Fuller v. Knapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fuller v. Knapp, 72 A. 688, 82 Vt. 166, 1909 Vt. LEXIS 266 (Vt. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Watson, J.

In the findings of fact, the chancellor says he is unable to find with the degree of certainty required by law that the orators reserved the tree tops in their trade with the defendant, or that they intended to have any reservation concerning the wood which they were to cut therefrom expressed in the deed to the defendant, and he is more inclined to think that they were content to let the understanding as to their right to get wood from the tree tops rest in parol. No admissions are made in defendant’s answer • requiring a different conclusion of fact.

The case presented does not entitle the orators to the relief sought. A court of equity will reform a written contract, and especially a deed, on the ground of mistake, only when the evidence showing the mistake is strong and of a conclusive character, such as shall establish the fact beyond reasonable doubt. Griswold v. Smith, 10 Vt. 452; Cleveland v. Burton, 11 Vt. 138; Goodell v. Field, 15 Vt. 448; Preston v. Whitcomb, 17 Vt. 183; Shattuck v. Gay, 45 Vt. 87; Barry v. Harris, 49 Vt. 392.

Decree affirmed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson, J.

In the findings of fact, the chancellor says he is unable to find with the degree of certainty required by law that the orators reserved the tree tops in their trade with the defendant, or that they intended to have any reservation concerning the wood which they were to cut therefrom expressed in the deed to the defendant, and he is more inclined to think that they were content to let the understanding as to their right to get wood from the tree tops rest in parol. No admissions are made in defendant’s answer • requiring a different conclusion of fact.

The case presented does not entitle the orators to the relief sought. A court of equity will reform a written contract, and especially a deed, on the ground of mistake, only when the evidence showing the mistake is strong and of a conclusive character, such as shall establish the fact beyond reasonable doubt. Griswold v. Smith, 10 Vt. 452; Cleveland v. Burton, 11 Vt. 138; Goodell v. Field, 15 Vt. 448; Preston v. Whitcomb, 17 Vt. 183; Shattuck v. Gay, 45 Vt. 87; Barry v. Harris, 49 Vt. 392.

Decree affirmed and cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 A. 688, 82 Vt. 166, 1909 Vt. LEXIS 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-knapp-vt-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack