Fuller v. Horning
This text of Fuller v. Horning (Fuller v. Horning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6385
GERALD DAVIS FULLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
D. KENNETH HORNING, Warden,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-02300-WMN)
Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerald Davis Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip M. Pickus, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Gerald Davis Fuller appeals the district court’s
orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Fuller v. Horning, No. 1:08-cv-02300-WMN (D. Md. Feb.
17, 2009; Mar. 11, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fuller v. Horning, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-horning-ca4-2009.