Fuller v. Hayden
This text of 83 F. App'x 975 (Fuller v. Hayden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AFFIRMED for the reasons given by the district court in its order of November [976]*9765, 2001. On remand, the district court shall amend its judgment to permit Fuller to move to reopen the case if the courts of the State of Idaho ultimately hold that he may not pursue a petition for writ of habe-as corpus in those courts.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with instructions.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 F. App'x 975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-hayden-ca9-2003.