Fuller v. Goldberg
This text of 156 S.E. 582 (Fuller v. Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case the plaintiffs filed an equitable petition against the defendants, praying that an execution based upon a certain judgment should be set aside on the ground that it was procured by fraud; and [697]*697for injunctive relief. After hearing the evidence, which was conflicting, the court passed the following order: “After hearing evidence in the within case, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that the relief sought by the plaintiffs be and the same is hereby denied, and the temporary restraining order heretofore granted is hereby dissolved.” Exception is taken to the action of the court in rendering said judgment. Construing the order of the court as merely denying, on conflicting evidence, the temporary injunction prayed for, and not as passing on the merits of the case at an interlocutory hearing, .it is held that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying a temporary injunction.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
156 S.E. 582, 171 Ga. 696, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fuller-v-goldberg-ga-1931.